Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://scholar.utcc.ac.th/handle/6626976254/3436
Title: The appreciative democratic voice of DEA: A case of faculty academic performance evaluation
Authors: Oral, M. 
Oukil, A. 
Malouin, J.L 
Kettani, O. 
Keywords: Academic performance;Appreciative democratic voice;DEA;Faculty evaluation;Judgmental decision;Self and crossefficiency
Issue Date: 2014
Publisher: Scopus
University of the Thai Chamber of Commerce
Source: M. Oral, A. Oukil, J.L Malouin, O. Kettani (2014) The appreciative democratic voice of DEA: A case of faculty academic performance evaluation. SocioEconomic Planning Sciences Vol.48 No.1, 20-28.
Abstract: Data envelopment analysis (DEA) is in fact more than just being an instrument for measuring the relative efficiencies of a group of decision making units (DMU). DEA models are also means of expressing appreciative democratic voices of DMUs. This paper proposes a methodology for allocating premium points to a group of professors using three models sequentially: (1) a DEAmodel for appreciative academic selfevaluation, (2) a DEA model for appreciative academic crossevaluation, and (3) a NonDEA model for academic rating of professors for the purpose of premium allocations. The premium results, called DEA results, are then compared with the premium points "nurtured" by the Dean, called N bonus points. After comparing DEA results and N bonus points, the Dean reassessed his initial bonus points and provided new ones called DEAN decisions. The experience indicates that judgmental decisions (Dean's evaluations) can be enhanced by making use of formal models (DEA and NonDEA models). Moreover, the appreciative and democratic voices of professors are virtually embedded in the DEA models.
URI: https://scholar.utcc.ac.th/handle/6626976254/3436
Rights: This work is protected by copyright. Reproduction or distribution of the work in any format is prohibited without written permission of the copyright owner.
Appears in Collections:RSO: Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
32.pdf142.89 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open
Show full item record Recommend this item

Page view(s)

8
checked on Jul 11, 2019

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.